<< All articles

Hollywood vs. High Performance: Is the New F1 Movie Undermining the Sport’s Elite Identity?

Formula 1 is a spectacle of speed, precision, and cutting-edge technology, a sport where engineering excellence and athletic prowess intersect on the world’s fastest stage. However, with the new Hollywood-backed Formula 1 film starring Brad Pitt and co-produced by Lewis Hamilton, some in the racing world are starting to wonder: Is F1 trading its elite, high-performance image for a more accessible, but oversimplified, Hollywood narrative?

The film, simply titled F1, is directed by Joseph Kosinski (Top Gun: Maverick) and supported by Apple Studios. It features Pitt as a veteran driver coming out of retirement to mentor a young rookie, set in a fictional eleventh team on the real F1 grid "APX GP". The production was heavily involved in the paddock, with Pitt even driving a modified F2 car during live race weekends for authentic footage.

While the commitment is commendable, along with some incredible cinematography, could the unrealistic storyline distort the very essence of the sport in order to appeal to a mass-market audience?

This post is for subscribers only

Already have an account? Log-in

<< All articles

Hollywood vs. High Performance: Is the New F1 Movie Undermining the Sport’s Elite Identity?

Formula 1 is a spectacle of speed, precision, and cutting-edge technology, a sport where engineering excellence and athletic prowess intersect on the world’s fastest stage. However, with the new Hollywood-backed Formula 1 film starring Brad Pitt and co-produced by Lewis Hamilton, some in the racing world are starting to wonder: Is F1 trading its elite, high-performance image for a more accessible, but oversimplified, Hollywood narrative?

The film, simply titled F1, is directed by Joseph Kosinski (Top Gun: Maverick) and supported by Apple Studios. It features Pitt as a veteran driver coming out of retirement to mentor a young rookie, set in a fictional eleventh team on the real F1 grid "APX GP". The production was heavily involved in the paddock, with Pitt even driving a modified F2 car during live race weekends for authentic footage.

While the commitment is commendable, along with some incredible cinematography, could the unrealistic storyline distort the very essence of the sport in order to appeal to a mass-market audience?

The film used the opportunity to put real life companies on its car

Hollywood thrives on underdog arcs, redemption stories, and dramatic rivalries and whilst F1 has all of that, if audiences come away thinking that a driver can simply “find speed through heart”, outwit rivals with pep talks and grit or simply cheat, the portrayal will misrepresent what F1 truly is: a technologically dense, multi-billion dollar enterprise where success hinges on thousands of hours of engineering, simulation, and split-second decisions.

Netflix’s Drive to Survive gave F1 a global boost in popularity, but it also drew criticism for dramatizing rivalries and taking creative liberties with team dynamics. While the series was instrumental in growing the U.S. fanbase, longtime enthusiasts often decry it for sacrificing technical accuracy for emotional appeal. The movie, with its fictional team and made-for-screen storyline, may take this a step further, cementing a perception of F1 that prioritises spectacle over substance.

And here lies the problem, F1’s global prestige lies in its image as the pinnacle of motorsport. Brands like Ferrari, Mercedes, and Red Bull invest billions because the sport reflects precision, exclusivity, and engineering superiority. If a Hollywood movie shifts that perception towards popcorn-level heroics, it could inadvertently undermine the values these sponsors and teams strive to uphold.

There’s also the risk that new fans, brought in by the movie, might experience a disconnect when they watch actual races and find them more nuanced, strategic, or even procedural than the film suggests.

All of this is not to say that a Formula 1 film must be a documentary to be good. In fact, the cinematic potential of F1 is enormous. The high speeds, dramatic lighting, and global locales offer rich visual storytelling. But the sport’s identity must remain intact. The best sports films are those that respect the soul of the game while making it accessible. Think Rush or Le Mans 66/Ford v Ferrari!

If F1 can embrace the true, multi-layered nature of the sport, where success is the result of relentless iteration, intense competition, and microscopic margins, it could become a cultural touchstone that lifts the sport even higher. But if it opts instead for easy narratives and emotional shortcuts, it may leave audiences entertained but misinformed, and a sport struggling to reclaim its high-performance identity from its own PR.

There’s no question that increased exposure can benefit the sport, especially in markets like the U.S. where F1 is still carving out space. But the line between accessibility and authenticity is thin. If the movie reduces Formula 1 to a simplistic tale of courage and comeback, it may compromise the sport’s greatest asset: its identity as the apex of human and machine performance.

The challenge, then, is not just to entertain, but to elevate, highlighting the drama without simplifying the discipline!